Compare › P2S vs X1C

P2S vs X1C

Last updated: · US store prices, struck-through = Bambu's "Typical Price" (median store price on at least 7 of the last 90 days, excluding promotions); X1C: launch price (discontinued) · daily price tracker

$650 under the X1C's launch price, here's what that premium actually bought

Which one should I buy?

Quick answer: Get the P2S ($549) if you're a hobbyist or even a serious maker. Look for a used X1C (launched at $1,199) only if you specifically need Lidar-assisted first-layer calibration (both have AI failure detection): it is discontinued since March 2026, and for a new machine its successor the X2D ($649) is the better buy.

Specs: Bambu Lab P2S tech specs · Bambu Lab X1 Carbon tech specs (PDF), checked October 2, 2026

Where to buy
P2SBambu Lab
X1 CarbonDiscontinued, see the X2D
Day-one accessoriesBuild plates · Filament dryers

Daily price history · Links to the Bambu Lab store and Amazon are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The X1C is discontinued (March 2026). Bambu ended the X1 series on 31 March 2026. Its direct successor is the X2D ($649), which adds an active 65°C chamber and a dual nozzle at a lower price. This comparison stays useful for the used market.

P2S

  • Sold new at $549, $650 below the X1C's launch price
  • 600mm/s vs 500mm/s, actually faster than the X1C
  • Newer platform with forward-looking software support

X1C

  • Lidar, scans first layers in real time for perfect adhesion
  • Micro Lidar for flow calibration, more consistent extrusion
  • Established platform with large community and accessory ecosystem

Specs at a glance

FeatureP2SX1C
Price$549$1,199
Build volume256 × 256 × 256 mm256 × 256 × 256 mm
Max speed600 mm/s500 mm/s
KinematicsCoreXYCoreXY
EnclosureYesYes
Chamber tempPassive (~50°C)Passive (not actively heated)
Max nozzle temp300°C300°C
AMS typeAMS, AMS 2 Pro, AMS HT (up to 20 slots)AMS, AMS 2 Pro, AMS HT (4 units)
LidarNoYes
AI failure detectionYesYes

What did the X1C's premium actually buy?

The core print quality of both machines at normal speeds is nearly identical. Both are enclosed CoreXY printers with 256 mm cube build volume. The X1C's premium pays for Lidar, which reduces manual first-layer checks, useful if you run prints unattended for hours and can't afford failures. AI failure detection is not a difference: Bambu lists AI error detection (spaghetti, nozzle blobbing) for the P2S too.

Ironically, the P2S is faster (600mm/s vs 500mm/s) because it's a newer platform. The X1C's Lidar does improve first-layer calibration meaningfully, but you can achieve excellent first layers on the P2S with proper bed prep.

Get the P2S if...

  • You're a hobbyist or enthusiast, even a serious one
  • You're present during prints and can catch failures yourself
  • You would rather buy new than hunt for a used, discontinued X1C
  • You want the faster machine (600mm/s)

Look for a used X1C (or get the X2D) if...

  • You run long unattended prints and failures are costly
  • You need Lidar first-layer verification for consistency (the X1C's successor, the X2D, has none)
  • You run a small print farm and need reliability automation
  • You accept buying used: the X1C is discontinued, so for a new machine take the X2D

Full specs and review: P2S page · X1C page

For hobbyists: no. Lidar is convenient, not transformative. You can get perfect first layers on the P2S with good bed prep and a small amount of experience. For production or farm use where you leave printers running overnight and failures cost real money, Lidar starts to justify itself. Honest answer: most people asking this question should buy the P2S.

More comparisons